Feature Request: Option for button order as columns instead of rows #2154


Open
  • Amethice created this issue Jun 2, 2023

    Usually, there hasn't really been a difference between having, for example, six rows of 2 icons instead of two columns of 6 icons.

     

    One place where it does get annoying is when you need to switch between Bartender and the native action bars - for horizontal bars everything can be set up so that all your buttons/icons are in the same place, but if you have a vertical bar you have no such option. This happens easily if you run WoW on more than one machine, and one of them isn't running a lot of addons (such as a Steam Deck setup for example).

     

    Instead, in Blizz action bar it will look like this:

     

    1    7

    2    8

    3    9

    4    A

    5    B

    6    C

     

    And in Bartender with six rows of two it will look like this:

     

    1   2

    3   4

    5   6

    7   8

    9   A

    B   C

     

    Just having the option of making it order the buttons in columns rather than rows would therefore be incredibly helpful when switching layouts from one to another.

  • Starlynk1 posted a comment Jun 15, 2023

    you can already do this. Change the number of buttons per row to 6 and change the vertical growth to Down. Then set your keybinds to however you want. The buttons really do not have a number location, its based on how you set up your keybinds as to the order.


    Edited Jun 15, 2023
  • Amethice posted a comment Jun 16, 2023

    I'm not sure what I'm missing here, My settings in Bartender4 does not have a "buttons per row" option.

    There is a only a "buttons" option and a "rows" option (set to 12 and 6 respectively), and I already have Vertical Growth to Down. If I was to have buttons per row to 6 effectively (ie "rows" set to 2), it will be horizontal like this:

     

    1 2 3 4 5 6

    7 8 9 A B C

     

    Which is not the same as the vertical layout I would want if I have it alongside the side of the screen:

    1  7

    2  8

    3  9

    4  A

    5  B

    6  C

     

    So how are do you mean that the functionality is already there? Am I missing something completely obvious somewhere?


To post a comment, please login or register a new account.