The reason I did not add that is that Blood Shield Tracker handles it already. DocsDebugRunes lacked a lot of the necessary code to be accurate too so I didn't include that in my first version of Compact Runes.
I'm just worried that not only is it more work but it makes it more likely that something is missed updating both addons.
Maybe I'll go back and try to find another way to handle it. I understand why people would like it although it definitely complicates things for me. Not everyone wants to use Compact Runes but they still want the functionality in BloodShieldTracker. I have three addons with overlapping features.
1 comment
Facts
Reported
Jan 05, 2013
Status
New - Issue has not had initial review yet.
Type
Enhancement - A change which is intended to better the project in some way
- Reply
- #1
talryn1 Jan 05, 2013 at 21:46 UTC - 0 likesThe reason I did not add that is that Blood Shield Tracker handles it already. DocsDebugRunes lacked a lot of the necessary code to be accurate too so I didn't include that in my first version of Compact Runes.
I'm just worried that not only is it more work but it makes it more likely that something is missed updating both addons.
Maybe I'll go back and try to find another way to handle it. I understand why people would like it although it definitely complicates things for me. Not everyone wants to use Compact Runes but they still want the functionality in BloodShieldTracker. I have three addons with overlapping features.