Recount

374 - need update for the newest patch

Submitted Via

Curse Client 4.0.1.104, Microsoft Windows NT 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1

Installed Version

v4.0.1e release

Description

this addon has not updated if there is a newer version please let me know at [email protected] so that I may download it... thank you

Installed Addons

_NPCScan - _NPCScan 4.1.0.1 _NPCScan.Overlay - _NPCScan.Overlay 4.1.0.1 Addon Control Panel - 3.3.14 Atlasloot Enhanced - v6.03.00 AtlasLoot_AdvancedSearch - v1.2.73 Auctionator - Version 2.9.1 Deadly Boss Mods - Deadly Boss Mods 4.74-5279 Decursive - 2.7.0 Gatherer - 3.2.3 MacroBank - r59 Mappy - 3.1.1 Omen Threat Meter - v3.1.0 QuestHubber - v1-beta5b Recount - v4.0.1e release Reforgenator - v1.3.6 Titan Panel [VuhDo] - Titan Panel [VuhDo] 1.1 TomTom - v40000-1.2.7 VuhDo - VuhDo 2.95

User When Change
auroraknight Apr 26, 2011 at 20:42 UTC Create

You must login to post a comment. Don't have an account? Register to get one!

  • 3 comments
  • Avatar of romracer romracer Apr 27, 2011 at 00:24 UTC - 0 likes

    Open Tracker.lua and search/replace:

    eventtype, srcGUID

    with:

    eventtype, hideCaster, srcGUID

    Its fixed the errors I've encountered so far. I'm not the official developer of this addon; this is only intended as a temporary workaround.

  • Avatar of YourKhan YourKhan Apr 26, 2011 at 22:46 UTC - 0 likes

    @jedimaster0121: Go

    seconded on the '"bit_band" (number expected, got string)' error.

  • Avatar of jedimaster0121 jedimaster0121 Apr 26, 2011 at 21:41 UTC - 0 likes

    I'm also experiencing problems after the patch:

    here's the LUA error popup (occurs every 10-15 seconds, even standing still, while in SW): Message: Recount-v4.0.1e release\Tracker.lua:905: bad argument #1 to "bit_band" (number expected, got string) Time: 04/26/11 16:33:51 Count: 114 Stack: Interface\AddOns\Recount\Tracker.lua:905: in function `CheckRetentionFromFlags' Interface\AddOns\Recount\Tracker.lua:975: in function `?' ...Ons\Ace3\CallbackHandler-1.0\CallbackHandler-1.0.lua:147: in function <...Ons\Ace3\CallbackHandler-1.0\CallbackHandler-1.0.lua:147> [string "safecall Dispatcher[14]"]:4: in function <[string "safecall Dispatcher[14]"]:4> [C]: ? [string "safecall Dispatcher[14]"]:13: in function `?' ...Ons\Ace3\CallbackHandler-1.0\CallbackHandler-1.0.lua:92: in function `Fire' Interface\AddOns\Ace3\AceEvent-3.0\AceEvent-3.0.lua:120: in function <Interface\AddOns\Ace3\AceEvent-3.0\AceEvent-3.0.lua:119>

    each one looks the same, just raises the count on it. I figured you could make sense of it.

    Locals: <none>

  • 3 comments

Facts

Last updated
Mar 30, 2012
Reported
Apr 26, 2011
Status
New - Issue has not had initial review yet.
Type
Patch - Source code patch for review
Priority
Medium - Normal priority.
Votes
1

Reported by

Possible assignees