4 - Plural forms of class names
What is the enhancement in mind? How should it look and feel?
I'd like to request that plural forms of the class names be added to the library. I have localizations available for many languages, but I need the placeholders to enter them.
I suggest using the current convention adopted in LibBabble-Race, which for the English version would mean adding these to the base translation list:
Warlocks = true,
Warriors = true,
Hunters = true,
Mages = true,
Priests = true,
Druids = true,
Paladins = true,
Shaman_PL = true,
Rogues = true,
Deathknights = "Death Knights",
| User | When | Change |
|---|---|---|
| Mundocani | Wed, 04 Feb 2009 20:29:20 | Create |
- 2 comments
- 2 comments
Facts
- Last updated on
- 04 Feb 2009
- Reported on
- 04 Feb 2009
- Status
- New - Issue has not had initial review yet.
- Type
- Enhancement - A change which is intended to better the project in some way
- Priority
- Medium - Normal priority.
Reported by
Possible assignees
-
- Manager
- Author
-
- Maintainer
-
- Maintainer
- #2
Mundocani Thu, 14 May 2009 03:28:31Shaman_PL, Shamans, makes no difference to me, I'd just like the plurals to be available.
- #1
Phanx Sun, 03 May 2009 18:15:23"Shamans" is a grammatically correct and perfectly acceptable plural form of "Shaman" that doesn't require semantic nonsense like "_PL". :p