BuffTheTree
Player buff tracker
It displays a list of all raid buffs your class requires (for example it hides Arcane Intellect for Rogues) and whether or not those are active. Inactive buffs are displayed in red and with a MISSING text, active ones are untainted and displayed with their duration.Options can be configured using the /btt slash command.
Tracked buffs:
- Flask
- Well fed
- Arcane Intellect
- Blessings
- Divine Spirit
- Mark of the Wild
- Power Word: Fortitude
- Shadow Protection
- Poisons/Imbues
Comments
-
gallantron Owner
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Jul 16, 2010-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Jul 16, 2010Fixed.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Jul 3, 2010heya, got this one as a welcome: Date: 2010-07-03 20:14:29 ID: 1 Error occured in: Global Count: ? Message: ..\AddOns\BuffTheTree\BuffTheTree.lua line 30: attempt to index local 'frame' (a number value) Debug: [C]: ? BuffTheTree\BuffTheTree.lua:30: BuffTheTree\BuffTheTree.lua:29
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Jul 3, 2010Date: 2010-07-03 20:14:29
ID: 1
Error occured in: Global
Count: ?
Message: ..\AddOns\BuffTheTree\BuffTheTree.lua line 30:
attempt to index local 'frame' (a number value)
Debug:
[C]: ?
BuffTheTree\BuffTheTree.lua:30:
BuffTheTree\BuffTheTree.lua:29
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Jun 30, 2010-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Jun 30, 2010To update you on this, I've just patched an alpha fix that tries to improve the CPU issues you've been experiencing.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Apr 25, 2010I'm trying to figure something out, but it's pretty hard to update buff timers without it. I might do a "hide buff timers" option, though.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Mar 27, 2010Hi there,
I was just wondering if you will update this addon again or if it is discontinued. I would really like to use this addon, but the CPU usage Zidomo mentioned already prevents me from running BuffTheTree :-( So I would really appreciate an update and just wanted you to know...
Greetings from Germany,
Freydis88 :)
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Jan 4, 2010NP with ignoring my post, but just an update on the progress of this.
r27 (alpha) is even worse in CPU usage than the previously tested r26 when the buff frame is showing. 27.0-30.0 CPU/second...heh. Also has a massive memory leak/consumption when the frame is showing: 75-80 KiB/second continually.
If you want to lag in raids, you know the mod to use ;).
Also doesn't seem to work, except when you have the frame showing all the time (Always Show Applied checkmarked in options). Have it tracking Paladin blessings (for example, Blessing of Might). Unless the above is checkmarked, the frame never shows up, whether or not the buff is actually applied to yourself. You'd expect it to show up when the buff is missing.
Good luck getting the resource consumption of this down to a usable level, etc..
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Dec 10, 2009r26, standalone updated libs, WoW 3.2.2.10505 live, USEnglish client/server. Tested with OptionHouse (http://wow.curse.com/downloads/wow-addons/details/optionhouse.aspx), CPU profiling enabled. When the frame is not onscreen, CPU usage for the Ace3 libraries does not increase and the mod itself uses 0.0. But when the frame (as shown in your screenshot) is onscreen, the CPU usage explodes to 8-9 CPU/second on idle. Which is extremely high.
Hope there is something you can do to reduce this; would be my preferred choice for such a mod if it didn't have this problem.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Dec 7, 2009Looks at first glance to be a nice alternative to the now discontinued BuffEnough. But one serious problem seen over every beta tested so far up to the latest r26: when the "missing buff" frame is onscreen, CPU usage goes through the roof.
r26, standalone updated libs, WoW 3.2.2.10505 live, USEnglish client/server. Tested with OptionHouse, CPU profiling enabled. When the frame is not onscreen, CPU usage for the Ace3 libraries does not increase and the mod itself uses 0.0. But when the frame (as shown in your screenshot) is onscreen, the CPU usage explodes to 8-9 CPU/second on idle. Which is extremely high.
Hope there is something you can do to reduce this; would be my preferred choice for such a mod if it didn't have this problem.